Cambridge from front page
#16
Posted 29 October 2009 - 08:43 PM
#21
Posted 11 November 2009 - 08:25 PM
This post has been edited by creation: 11 November 2009 - 08:26 PM
#22
Posted 11 November 2009 - 09:32 PM
#25
Posted 12 November 2009 - 02:43 PM
#26
#27
Posted 13 November 2009 - 03:03 AM
littletown3 is definatly horrible and I know that
this is an old speed mapping i ve done for Lan party at the office.
My maps are concrete textured because I am lazzy. concrete textures looks real btw.
But I would do a better job if I have to enhance a well known existing map.
No offense. I just ask why most ut maps looks so old styled by comparison to other free games.
This post has been edited by loran: 13 November 2009 - 03:10 AM
#29
Posted 13 November 2009 - 03:52 AM
loran, on 13 November 2009 - 03:03 PM, said:
No offense. I just ask why most ut maps looks so old styled by comparison to other free games.
given the limits to the engine and the reason that this is a well known awesome TS map which is the sole purpose of bringing it back, im not going to ruin it by making your fps at 50 with the excuse of "oh but it looks good"
how about you make your own maps that look great and see how much people play it when your fps is at <60 take suburbs for example looks nice but horrible fps
#30
Posted 13 November 2009 - 01:56 PM
Delirium, on 13 November 2009 - 02:52 AM, said:
I agree with that. But I am not speaking about using bigger or much more textures. I am talking about the texture look.
Ok Sorry I didnt want to offense anyone but I m upset to see we could do very beautiful maps but people always use the same old textures...
forget it :]


















MultiQuote




